Aldervane General Contractors
Wood-frame multifamily, Denver
“Organized site. Payment lag of two to three weeks past terms on most applications.”
“We moved to a 15th-of-month check run in August and expect to be inside terms from here.”
Subs, GCs, developers and suppliers rate each other on real projects. Payment records come from invoices and remittances, not opinions.
Wood-frame multifamily, Denver
“Organized site. Payment lag of two to three weeks past terms on most applications.”
“We moved to a 15th-of-month check run in August and expect to be inside terms from here.”
Subs and GCs don't even agree on how late payment is.
Average wait after submitting a pay app. Billd National Subcontractor Market Report, June 2026, survey of 600+ subs, suppliers and GCs
No project on file, no rating.
A contract, PO, pay app or invoice shows the two companies worked together. A moderator checks it.
Each company rates the other. Neither sees the other's review until both are in or 14 days pass. Same rule for good reviews and bad ones.
Invoice due date and the date the money arrived. The other side confirms it or disputes it.
A company can answer publicly or send facts to a moderator. Nobody can erase the other side's review.
Days late = date paid minus the contractual due date, never below zero. Some payments are set aside instead of counted.
55 days late
Paid 55 days after the due date. This counts toward the payment index.
Aldervane's payment index: 76 becomes 72
Demo scoring. The real weights get set with pilot companies.
Payment and performance are separate scores. A good builder can be a slow payer, and the profile shows both.
Suppliers work the same way. A supplier rates its customer on payment, order clarity and delivery access. The customer rates the supplier's delivery times, order accuracy, product quality and billing.
Some of them cover part of it. Here's what each kind is built for, and what it leaves out.
| Tool | How it works | What it can't tell you |
|---|---|---|
| Lien and payment toolsLevelset (Procore) | Lien notices and waivers. Its public payment profiles used to rate GCs and owners as fast or slow payers. | Profile reviews were anonymous and one-way. Levelset has since stopped hosting contractor reviews and hid the payment score. Levelset FAQ (archived) |
| Business credit reportsD&B, Experian | Suppliers report how a buyer pays its bills. | Only suppliers that choose to report are counted. Experian says about 10,000 of the 500,000+ suppliers that extend credit report to it. Nothing on how a company runs a job. Experian FAQ |
| Prequalification platformsISNetworld, Highwire, TradeTapp | The hiring company vets a contractor's safety, insurance and financials. | It runs one way. The sub doesn't rate the GC or owner back, so you see nothing about how the GC or owner pays. |
| Homeowner reviews and BBBAngi, BuildZoom, BBB | Property owners review contractors. BBB's grade leans on complaint history. | Company-to-company work: how a GC treats its subs, how a sub performs for a GC, how a builder pays its suppliers. |
| ContractorRef | Every company on a project rates the companies it worked with, and logs payment dates. | Credit history, insurance, safety programs. Use it alongside those tools, not instead of them. |
No contract, PO, pay app or invoice on file, no review. Every rating is tied to a project both companies actually worked on.
We check Colorado Secretary of State records for shared registered agents and addresses. A moderator reviews each possible match, and the company can respond before anything is linked.
The sub rates the GC and the GC rates the sub on the same project. Neither side sees the other's review until both are in or 14 days pass.
A rating site is only worth checking if the companies on it think it's fair. These rules apply to everyone.
Three questions for subcontractors. Think of one GC you've worked with this year.
Denver metro first: GCs and developers, trades, and suppliers. Free during the pilot.
A few finished projects you can document, and honest feedback on the rules.
Your profile set up before public launch, free access during the pilot, and a say in how scores and disputes work.
Nothing is published outside the pilot group until the dispute process has been tested.
We'll reach out within a few business days to talk through the pilot. In the meantime, the demo shows how profiles and reviews work.
Something else? Ask in the form above and we'll answer it directly.
No. Every review shows which company wrote it. Supporting documents like pay apps and lien waivers are seen only by moderators.
It's a fair worry, since reviews aren't anonymous. Both sides rate at the same time and neither sees the other's review until both are in, so it isn't one sub calling out a GC on its own. And payment records come from documents, not opinions.
No. It can respond publicly, and it can send facts to a moderator if something is wrong. The review stays up while it's checked, and corrections are logged.
Mark the invoice as disputed and attach the reason. A moderator checks it, and it doesn't count toward the payment score while it's open. The number of disputes shows on your profile.
Other members see each invoice's due date, paid date and days late. Not amounts or contract terms. Moderators and the two companies involved see the documents.
Colorado doesn't list LLC owners publicly, so we compare what the Secretary of State does publish: registered agent, principal office and mailing address. Plenty of unrelated companies share a commercial registered agent, so a match is only a signal. A moderator reviews every one, and the company can respond before anything is linked.
Nothing. It's free during the pilot.
A network is only useful when your real partners are on it, and payment rules differ by state. Colorado, for example, caps retainage at 5% on most private projects where the prime contract is $150,000 or more, and on the subcontracts under them (HB21-1167). We'd rather get one market right first.